Walmart Prostitute Charged in Bathroom Encounters

APRIL 26–A Walmart employee is facing a prostitution charge for allegedly “soliciting sexual encounters” inside the upstate New York store where he works, police report.

Foster Bills, 22, was arrested after Walmart managers contacted state troopers to report that they had received “an anonymous complaint of a male subject performing sexual acts in a secluded location” in the Queensbury store.

Fosters Bill could be found in the clearance section, because this dude is fugally. Is this what people get for there money today in the world of Walmart Prostitutes? Stick with a target folks!

The “secluded location” was apparently a Walmart bathroom, and johns were solicited through Craigslist “casual encounters” ads.

20130427-023322.jpg
In response to the Walmart complaint, cops launched an undercover investigation that resulted in an arrest Wednesday “after he accepted cash for sex from an undercover State Police Investigator,” according to a press release.

Seen above in a Facebook photo, Bills was charged with a misdemeanor prostitution count and ordered to appear April 29 in town court.

Investigators have also reportedly tied Bills to a Craigslist ad that sought to arrange sexual liaisons at a public library. “Young guy looking for a little spending money,” noted the “m4m” ad that indicates it was placed by a 22-year-old.

Now what I really need to point out, is that did anyone actually show up to meet this guy. Or did he just get caught by the sting operation with the undercover. Is this what all Walmart prostitute’s look like. Then what do the Walmart Hookers look like?

Can the lady’s be any hotter, I guess we will wait to see, in the next article for Walmart Hookers. I’m sure it will be out soon.

2 Comments on “Walmart Prostitute Charged in Bathroom Encounters

  1. While I can applaud your attempt at blogging, could you at least learn the difference between the words “their” and “there”? Re-read your article, and see if you can spot that mistake. Also, the plural of *lady* is “ladies”, NOT “lady’s” (*lady’s* is the possessive form, or a contraction of ‘lady was’ or ‘lady is’). AND, the plural of ‘prostitute’ does not have an apostrophe in it….really, somehow, somewhere, EVERYwhere, it’s a good idea to write English properly and grammatically correct…we (in general) are getting lazy, with texting so common nowadays…and it is very sad…..

    • Hello TJ,
      I appreciate you taking the effort to read and evaluate this article. I will make the necessary correction tonight. I would like to thank you for your time! I will use your suggestions on my next post.

Leave a Reply